Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Sharp v. The Bowling Green Kentucky Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Sharp, Jr.
Defendant:
The Bowling Green Kentucky Police Department, Stephen Irwin and Joshua Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Muse v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2023cv00588
Plaintiff:
Gavin Muse
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America doing business as CoreCivic, Jerry Wardlow, f/n/u Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MIKANDA v. SHARP et al
as 1:2022cv02647
Plaintiff:
PHD NEYEMBO MIKANDA and PH.D. NEYEMBO MIKANDA
Defendant:
ANDREW SHARP, ANTHONY D'AMICO, ANTHONY RIVERA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Glenn v. Walker et al
as 1:2021cv01013
Defendant:
Lt. Parram, Capt. Walker, Sgt. Christian and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest J. Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHARP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv90404
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SHARP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHARP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv70296
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ANDREW SHARP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHARP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv71696
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ANDREW SHARP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Town of Jupiter Police Department et al
as 9:2019cv80513
Defendant:
Town of Jupiter Police Department, Andrew Sharp, David Aronberg and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Southwest General Health Center v. Sharp et al
as 1:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
Southwest General Health Center
Defendant:
Andrew Sharp
3rd_pty_defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs
3rd_party_plaintiff:
Andrew Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
