Cases 1 - 10 of 111
Wilson v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00897
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Wilson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilson v. Farm Credit Mid-America, ACA et al
as 3:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Andrew Wilson
Defendant:
Farm Credit Mid-America, ACA, Farm Credit Mid-America, FLCA, Farm Credit Mid-America, PCA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
US v. Andrew Wilson
as 23-6960
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW SCOTT WILSON, a/k/a Scott Andrew Wilson
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18511
Plaintiff:
ANDREW WILSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramon Boyce v. City Hall for Springfield, OH, et al
as 23-3533
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMON BOYCE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY HALL FOR SPRINGFIELD, OH, DAVID ANDREW WILSON, Senior Policy Advisor/Criminal Justice, CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
US v. Andrew Wilson
as 22-7422
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW SCOTT WILSON, a/k/a Scott Andrew Wilson
McIlquham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01132
Plaintiff:
Andrew Wilson McIlquham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15198
Plaintiff:
MARC ANDREW WILSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Wilson
as 22-50688
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Andrew Wilson, also known as Wiggy
Nasseri v. Wilson
as 8:2022cv01543
Plaintiff:
Sepehr Michael Nasseri
Defendant:
Andrew Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
