Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Hill v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Angela Hill
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HILL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv13730
Plaintiff:
ANGELA HILL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adams et al v. Cook County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2023cv01390
Plaintiff:
Chatara Adams, Monica Aguilar, Carol Allen and others
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff's Office and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
McCraw v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00402
Plaintiff:
Angela Hill McCraw
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Hearne et al v. Welsh Pawn Shop, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00090
Plaintiff:
Linda Hearne , Joanna Velez and Angela Hill
Defendant:
Welsh Pawn Shop, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schwartzenberg v. Benson et al
as 2:2016cv01822
Plaintiff:
Craig Schwartzenberg
Defendant:
Gayle Benson, Angela Hill, Michelle Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv09627
Plaintiff:
Angela Hill
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hill v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2012cv02153
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Angela Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
