Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Russell v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2019cv00346
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Plaintiff:
Anita Russell
Not Yet Classified:
Scott L Bunnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Russell et al v. Oklahoma State Department of Human Services et al
as 6:2017cv00305
Plaintiff:
David Russell and Anita Russell
Defendant:
Oklahoma State Department of Human Services , Jessica Shipman, Rob Seale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
First Mercury Insurance Company v. Kimes Steel, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv15837
Plaintiff:
First Mercury Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kimes Steel, Inc., Jeffrey Russell and Anita Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Anita Russell v. Denney Wright
as 13-1865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANITA RUSSELL, Personal Representative for the Estate of Daniel Russell
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNEY WRIGHT
Defendant:
APPOMATTOX COUNTY, VIRGINIA, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Russell et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2013cv01656
Plaintiff:
Donald Russell and Anita Russell
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Russell et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as LAW/6:13-cv-01656
Plaintiff:
Donald Russell and Anita Russell
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Russell v. Wright et al
as 3:2011cv00075
Interested Party:
Albemarle County Circuit Court
Defendant:
Appomattox County, Commonwealth Of Virginia, Taser International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Anita Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Russell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2008cv00296
Plaintiff:
Anita Russell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
