Cases 1 - 10 of 29
In re: Snyder
as 23-1763
Appellant:
In re: LINDA ANNE SNYDER and MARGARET K. YU
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Snyder v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv06129
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Snyder
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Snyder v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv03532
Plaintiff:
Patricia Anne Snyder
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sunshine Heifers, LLC v. Snyder et al
as 1:2018cv02120
Plaintiff:
Sunshine Heifers, LLC
Defendant:
Mike Snyder, Shirley Ann Snyder and Melissa Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1578
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Snyder v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00995
Plaintiff:
Melissa Anne Snyder
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Canty et al v. Dunning, Kirrane, McNichols & Garner, LLP
as 1:2017cv40080
Defendant:
Dunning, Kirrane, McNichols & Garner, LLP
Plaintiff:
John Canty , Kimberly Canty , Amy J. Dray and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Canty et al v. Dunning, Kirrane, McNichols & Garner, LLP
as 4:2017cv40080
Defendant:
Dunning, Kirrane, McNichols & Garner, LLP
Plaintiff:
John Canty , Kimberly Canty , Amy J. Dray and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00840
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Snyder v. Norfolk Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2016cv00567
Petitioner:
Vivian Anne Snyder
Respondent:
Norfolk Commonwealth of Virginia and Judge Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
