Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Murphy #769317 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Anthony Murphy #769317
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi E. Washington, Unknown Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Sanders, et al v. Matt Macauley, et al
as 22-1502
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON L. SANDERS
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MURPHY
Defendant / Appellee:
MATT MACAULEY, Warden, UNKNOWN WALZACH, Deputy Warden, BRIAN HADDEN, Assistant Deputy Warden of Housing and others
Sanders #305405 et al v. Macauley et al
as 1:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Sanders #305405, Anthony Murphy #769317, Maurice H. Fielding #666102 and others
Defendant:
Matt Macauley, Unknown Walzach, Brian Hadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv09507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy #769317 v. Sterle et al
as 1:2021cv00457
Defendant:
B. Hadden, L. Sterle, Michael Walczak and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Murphy #769317
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Hall et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00323
Defendant:
Nicholas Hall, Ell Deramus, Charles Mosely and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. USA
as 6:2018cv06442
Petitioner:
Anthony Murphy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Charles Anthony Murphy v. Raymond Madden
as 8:2016cv02074
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Petitioner:
Charles Anthony Murphy
Murphy v. Unnamed Police Officer's et al
as 4:2016cv04137
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Murphy
Defendant:
Unnamed Police Officer's and United States Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
