Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Woods v. Cadle et al
as 3:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Anthony Woods
Defendant:
Lindsey Cadle, Apryl Bradshaw, Tonia McFarland Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. S.C. Department of Social Services et al
as 6:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Anthony Woods
Defendant:
S.C. Department of Social Services, Child Support Enforcement and Cintas Headquarters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. SC Department of Social Services
as 6:2023cv04812
Plaintiff:
Anthony Woods
Defendant:
SC Department of Social Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Woods v. Wagoner, City of et al
as 6:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Anthony Woods
Defendant:
Wagoner, City of, Wagoner Police Department, Tony Ponds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baugh et al v. Austal USA, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
Paul David Baugh, Jr., David Dudley, Carl Skipper and others
Defendant:
Austal U.S.A., L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Baugh et al v. Austal USA, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Paul David Baugh, Jr., David Dudley, Carl Skipper and others
Defendant:
Austal USA, LLC and John Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hideyuki Kimura v. FAA, et al
as 22-55318
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HIDEYUKI KIMURA I, Esquire
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, LISA TOSCANO, ADAM RUNKEL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00154
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Candonoza v. Polk County et al
as 4:2016cv00048
Plaintiff:
Sarah Candonoza
Defendant:
Polk County , Kenny Dodd , Ken Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Willis v. Polk County et al
as 4:2016cv00047
Plaintiff:
Trixie Willis
Defendant:
Polk County , Kenny Dodd , Ken Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
