Cases 71 - 80 of 2,426
Ferguson et al v. Department of Children & Families et al
as 9:2023cv81541
Plaintiff:
Randal A. Ferguson, R.A.F. J., R.A.F. and others
Defendant:
Department of Children & Families, Child Net Inc., Nicole Slade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CALLERY et al v. DELOS CAPITAL, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04784
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CALLERY and TINA FASANO
Defendant:
DELOS CAPITAL, LLC, SHOREVEST CAPITAL, LLC, STEVE ZAMBITO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Johnathan Williams
as 23-13858
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHNATHAN ANTON WILLIAMS
Ewing v. Camus et al
as 3:2023cv02154
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
Pablo Garces Camus and Dboss Funding, LLC
Ewing v. Isaac et al
as 3:2023cv02127
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
Isaam Isaac and Fun in the Sun Tours, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
JOSEY v. US POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 3:2023cv24713
Plaintiff:
ANTON J JOSEY
Defendant:
US POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATE OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
United States of America v. Santana (Brooks)
as 23-7788
Defendant:
ELVIS SANTANA, DANNY BUENO, ANGEL DELACRUZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SHAUN BROOKS
Roscoe v. Sunflower County et al
as 4:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Denarius Antone Roscoe
Defendant:
Sunflower County Sheriff Department, Darius Thigpin, James Haywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
