Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 815
Behr v. Payne
as 4:2023cv00854
Plaintiff: Gregory Bruce Behr
Defendant: Arkansas, State of and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamilton v. Arkansas, State of We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00846
Plaintiff: Kevin L Hamilton, Jr
Defendant: Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Arkansas, State of We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00835
Plaintiff: Arick Marquett Johnson
Defendant: Arkansas, State of and Robert Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Arizona, State of et al v. Michael D Lansky LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff: Arizona, State of, Alabama, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Defendant: Michael D Lansky LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Avid Telecom, Michael D Lansky individually as a Member/Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom and Stacy S Reeves individually as a Manager/Vice President of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Christopher Buchanan v. Bobby May, et al
as 23-3024
Plaintiff / Appellant: Christopher Buchanan
Defendant: Bobby May, St. Francois County Sheriff and David Underwood, Arkansas State Jail Coordinator
Defendant / Appellee: Darrell Elkin, "Doctor" SFCJ Contract Provider
Finch v. Hollingsworth et al
as 4:2023cv00834
Plaintiff: Elliott Finch, Jr
Defendant: Terri Hollingsworth, Eric Higgins, Leslie Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Arkansas, State of
as 2:2023cv00171
Plaintiff: Stacey D Morris
Defendant: Arkansas, State of and Arkansas Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Koontz v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00745
Plaintiff: Morris B Koontz
Defendant: Dexter Payne, William Straughn and Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Helen Doe, et al v. Thomas Horne, et al
as 23-16030
Plaintiff / Appellee: HELEN DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, KATE ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe and others
Defendant / Appellant: THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Defendant: LAURA TOENJES, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Kyrene School District, KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT, GREGORY SCHOOL and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WARREN PETERSEN, Senator, President of the Arizona State Senate and BEN TOMA, Representative, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives
Amicus Curiae: MARY I. O'CONNOR, CAROL BROWN, PATRICIA SPRATLEN ETEM, VALERIE McCLAIN, AND JAN PALCHIKOFF, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, AND SAMARITAN'S PURSE, INDEPENDENT COUNCIL ON WOMENS SPORT and others
Helen Doe, et al v. Thomas Horne, et al
as 23-16026
Plaintiff / Appellee: HELEN DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, JAMES DOE, parent and next friend of Jane Doe, KATE ROE, parent and next friend of Megan Roe and others
Defendant: THOMAS C. HORNE, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction, LAURA TOENJES, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Kyrene School District, KYRENE SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WARREN PETERSEN, Senator, President of the Arizona State Senate and BEN TOMA, Representative, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives
Amicus Curiae: MARY I. O'CONNOR, CAROL BROWN, PATRICIA SPRATLEN ETEM, VALERIE McCLAIN, AND JAN PALCHIKOFF, CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA, AND SAMARITAN'S PURSE, INDEPENDENT COUNCIL ON WOMENS SPORT and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?