Cases 1 - 10 of 262
Evans v. Sgt. Upole et al
as 1:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Glenn Evans
Defendant:
Sgt. Upole, Ofc. Kock, Sgt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024oe01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Arp v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
James Arp, Jr.
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP d/b/a Wal-Mart #698
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Eric Poole v. R. Roderick
as 24-6327
Plaintiff:
ERIC VON POOLE
Defendant:
R. RODERICK, CMM, PAUL WHEELER, CMM, NBCI (individual/official capacity), WCI'S ARP COORDINATOR, day of (individual/official capacity) and others
McMahan et al v. Olin Corporation et al (JRG1)
as 1:2024cv00096
Defendant:
Olin Corporation, Lonza Walkersville, Inc., Olin Chlor Alkali Products and others
Plaintiff:
LaMotta McMahan, Mauricio Acevedo, Marilyn B. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv17072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Sharpless v. ARP et al
as 3:2023cv02811
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clay Sharpless
Defendant:
ARP, MLKJ Station, Friends for Life and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ARP Inc. v. Citibank NA
as 1:2023cv16804
Plaintiff:
ARP Inc.
Defendant:
Citibank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
