Cases 21 - 30 of 494
Arreola v. United States of America
as 23-6786
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN PABLO ARREOLA
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rojas et al v. Ebels Construction LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00694
Plaintiff:
David Juvenal Moreno Rojas, Arturo Arreola Zaizar, Arcadio Arreola and others
Defendant:
Ebels Construction LLC, Bret Ebels and Ebels Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
(HC) Romero v. Warden
as 2:2023cv01068
Petitioner:
Martin Arreola Romero
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Arreola v. C.R. England, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Arreola
Defendant:
C.R. England, Inc., Jovon Byrde and Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03365
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gilberto Chavez v. United States
as 23-1938
Petitioner / Appellant:
Gilberto Arreola Chavez
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Morales Arreola v. USA
as 4:2023cv00336
Petitioner:
Jose Juan Morales Arreola
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Flores et al v. Amazing Grace Primary Home Care, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Albert Mascorro Flores, Christina Vargas, Martha Ramos and others
Defendant:
AMAZING GRACE PRIMARY HOME CARE, LLC, Juan Jose Pizana-Rosales, Javier C Cavazos and others
Gonzalo Arreola-Garcia v. U.S. Attorney General
as 23-10840
Petitioner:
GONZALO ARREOLA-GARCIA
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
