Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00225
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robinson v. Frozen Foods Express/Conwell Voluntary Employee Benefits Plan
as 3:2014cv04291
Plaintiff:
Arthur Robinson
Defendant:
Frozen Foods Express/Conwell Voluntary Employee Benefits Plan
Movant:
FFE Transportation Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Robinson v. Frozen Foods Express/Conwell Voluntary Employee Benefits Plan
as 1:2014cv02918
Plaintiff:
Arthur Robinson
Defendant:
Frozen Foods Express/Conwell Voluntary Employee Benefits Plan
Movant:
FFE Transportation Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Arthur Robinson
as 12-2966
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ARTHUR ROBINSON
Reynolds v. Nguyen et al
as 3:2012cv00012
Defendant:
Linda Carranza-Gonzales, David O. Chavez, Joehassin Cordero, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas K. Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Trevino et al
as 5:2010cv00968
Defendant:
Raymond Almendarez, Matt Barber, Sandra Castenada and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foley et al v. Auerbach et al
as 1:2010cv11797
Plaintiff:
Joseph Foley , George-Arthur Robinson , Mark Schofield and others
Defendant:
John Auerbach, Abdullah Rehayem and Richard Heidlage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
