Cases 21 - 30 of 198
CARROLL v. DELAWARE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al
as 2:2022cv00252
Plaintiff:
ARTIS C. CARROLL and ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, ANNE M. COOGAN and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CARROLL v. LOVE, ET AL
as 2:2021cv05691
Plaintiff:
ARTIS C CARROLL, JR
Defendant:
NUSRAT LOVE, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARROLL v. BRENNAN
as 2:2021cv05685
Plaintiff:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Defendant:
MARY BRENNAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARROLL v. THE LIFE CENTER EASTERN DELAWARE, ET AL. et al
as 2:2021cv05669
Plaintiff:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Defendant:
THE LIFE CENTER EASTERN DELAWARE, ET AL., JOHN WEIS, GINA DONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Bahrke et al v. Door County Board of Adjustment, et al
as 1:2021cv01375
Plaintiff:
Michael S Bahrke, Peter Orlik, Artie Orlik Family Trust created under the Last Will and Testament of Artie Orlik dated April 24, 2000 and others
Defendant:
Door County Board of Adjustment and Door County
Intervenor Defendant:
Camp Zion Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Pittman v. Devereux et al
as 2:2021cv01786
Plaintiff:
Alka A Pittman
Defendant:
Mary C Devereux, Phyllis Gremillion, Ernest Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
