Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ARTRIP v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv06708
Plaintiff:
KAREN ARTRIP
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ARTRIP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv03761
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ARTRIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARTRIP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv22553
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRADRICK ARTRIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Artrip v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv01315
Plaintiff:
Shawna Renee Artrip
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Artrip v. Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated et al
as 2:2010cv02429
Plaintiff:
Martin Artrip
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated, Botanical Laboratories Incorporated, Zicam LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Artrip v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv01050
Plaintiff:
Martin Artrip
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives, Inc., Zicam, LLC, Zicam Swab Products, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Artrip v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 2:2008cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jerry Artrip
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Artrip v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2008cv00200
Plaintiff:
Jerry Artrip
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Sanders v. Artrip
as 7:2007cv00108
Plaintiff:
Otis Sanders
Defendant:
Kenny Artrip and Kenny Artrip
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
