Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Zimmer v. Ashe County Child Support Services et al
as 5:2026cv00276
Defendant:
Ashe County Sheriff's Office, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services and Ashe County Child Support Services
Plaintiff:
Jacob Daniel Zimmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv00705
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ash v. Mavis Tire Supply, LLC
as 7:2026cv09765
Defendant:
Mavis Tire Supply, LLC
Plaintiff:
Damien Ash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nm Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Reeners v. Ash, et al.
as 3:2026cv01731
Defendant:
Jane and John Does 1-5 and Don R. Ash
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jayson Reeners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv02533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hannon v. McFadden et al
as 3:2026cv00894
Plaintiff:
Aaron Hannon
Defendant:
Garry McFadden, Carolyn Ashe, Steven Buchanan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ash v. Carlton County Sheriff's Office et al
as 0:2026mc00082
Plaintiff:
Davenell L. Ash
Defendant:
Carlton County Sheriff's Office, St. Louis County Sheriff's Office, Duluth Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
VanRyswyk v. Jolly, et al.
as 1:2026cv00102
Plaintiff:
Ashley Vanryswyk
Defendant:
Shay Jolly, Melissa Cunningham, Stephanie Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01783
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv11887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
