Cases 1 - 10 of 897
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv06384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hiscox Insurance Company Inc v. Pender et al
as 3:2024cv03245
Defendant:
Clover Abercrombie, Linda Pender, Abraham Russell and others
Plaintiff:
Hiscox Insurance Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Ashford v. 3M Company Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
Vera Ashford
Defendant:
3M Company Inc, Toray Fluorofibers (America) Inc and Daikin America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Eugene Baker, et al v. Blackhawk Mining, LLC, et al
as 24-5490
Plaintiff:
EUGENE BAKER, LESTER BAKER, PATRICIA BAKER and others
Defendant:
BLACKHAWK MINING, LLC and PINE BRANCH MINING, LLC
Zimmerman v. Thomas et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ivan Zimmerman
Defendant:
Sheriff Bryan Thomas, Chaplain Richard Ashford, Chief FNU Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AMR Resources, LLC v. Ashford Leebcor Enterprises V, LLC
as 4:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
AMR Resources, LLC doing business as Multiband Global
Defendant:
Ashford Leebcor Enterprises V, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CARLAN v. ASHFORD
as 5:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARLAN
Defendant:
JUDGE JASON E ASHFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wulfekuhle v. Ashford TRS Dulles LLC
as 1:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wulfekuhle
Defendant:
Ashford TRS Dulles LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
