Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Whitter v. Barr
as 1:2020cv00222
Respondent:
Attorney General William Barr
Petitioner:
Erwin Whitter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05971
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Lodge v. Barr
as 2:2020cv00164
Petitioner:
Robert Lodge
Respondent:
Attorney General William Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lodge v. Barr
as 1:2020cv02970
Petitioner:
Robert Lodge
Respondent:
Attorney General William Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lodge v. Barr
as 1:2020cv02971
Petitioner:
Robert Lodge
Respondent:
Attorney General William Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Griffin v. Joyner et al
as 7:2020cv00086
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, Officer Webb, Attorney General William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pugin v. Barr
as 1:2020cv02825
Respondent:
Attorney General William Barr
Petitioner:
Jean Francois Pugin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hollis v. Barr et al
as 9:2020cv00594
Petitioner:
Maurice Hollis
Respondent:
Warden S. Lovett and Attorney General William Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Banks v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv10958
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and US Attorney General William Barr
Petitioner:
Fredrick C. Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Arevalo Carrillo v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2020cv00192
Respondent:
MATTHEW T ALBENCE, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S Attorney General William Barr and others
Petitioner:
Elmer Alfredo Arevalo Carrillo
Defendant:
Acting Director Todd Lyons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
