Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Dibble v. United States of America
as 8:2022cv02905
Plaintiff:
Robert William Dibble
Defendant:
William F. Planer, Ruth B. Cassidy, Malik H. Aluqdah and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Dunne v. Mohave, County of et al
as 3:2021cv08219
Plaintiff:
David Dunne
Defendant:
Mohave, County of, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Mohave County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Mohave, County of et al
as 3:2019cv08183
Defendant:
W.T Dixon, Mohave, County of, S Portillo and others
Plaintiff:
Michael David Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASSIDY et al v. MERCK & CO. INC. et al
as 2:2018cv20041
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME and MERCK & CO. INC.
Plaintiff:
LARRY CASSIDY and MARY B. CASSIDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASSIDY et al v. MERCK & CO. INC. et al
as NJ/3:18-cv-02527
Plaintiff:
LARRY CASSIDY and MARY B. CASSIDY
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME
CASSIDY et al v. MERCK & CO. INC. et al
as 3:2018cv02527
Plaintiff:
LARRY CASSIDY and MARY B. CASSIDY
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wimbush v. Bishop
as 1:2014cv00930
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Wimbush
Defendant:
Iser, Caple, Wilt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jeffrey Young-Bey v. A. Logston
as 12-7182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY MAURICE YOUNG-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
A. LOGSTON, CO II, J. SMITH, C. M. CAMPBELL, Case Manager and others
Defendant:
FRANK B. BISHOP, Security Chief and JOHN DOES
:
Cassidy et al v. Bright House Networks, LLC
as 8:2012cv01120
Plaintiff:
Albert B. Cassidy , Steven L. Cassidy , Peter E. Cassidy and others
Defendant:
Bright House Networks, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
