Cases 81 - 90 of 100
Edwards v. Actavis Totowa, LLC, et al
as 2:2009cv00420
Plaintiff:
Burnidette B. Edwards, Burnidette B. Edwards and Burnidette B. Edwards
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa, LLC, Actavis Totowa, LLC, Actavis Totowa, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lyles v. Lemmon, et al
as 09-30105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE M LYLES
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY ANN V LEMMON, KAREN WELLS ROBY, PETER BEER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv20065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lyles v. Lemmons, et al
as 08-31208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE M LYLES
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY ANN V LEMMON, KAREN WELLS ROBY, PETER BEER and others
ASSOCIATES IN FEMALE HEALTH CARE, P.A. et al v. EDWARDS et al
as 2:2008cv06208
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATES IN FEMALE HEALTH CARE, P.A.
Defendant:
URSULA B. EDWARDS-OSBORNE
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
URSULA B. EDWARDS
ThirdParty Defendant:
HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
EDWARDS v. CAMPBELL
as 4:2008cv00527
Petitioner:
JOHNATHAN B EDWARDS
Respondent:
LARRY CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lyles v. Lemmon et al
as 2:2008cv04127
Plaintiff:
Ronnie M Lyles
Defendant:
Mary Ann Vial Lemmon, Karen Wells Roby, Peter Beer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
James Edwards, Jr. v. M. Townsel-Munday
as 08-1348
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES B. EDWARDS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
M. TOWNSEL-MUNDAY, RUM, No. 196473
Abrams et al v. Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp. et al
as 1:2008cv00068
Plaintiff:
Cleon Abrams, Sr., Cleveland Abrams, Sr., Adell M. Adams and others
Defendant:
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp., Ciba-Geigy Corp., Novartis, Ltd., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
