Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Godbold v. Field et al
as 3:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Marshall Godbold
Defendant:
Newell B. Field and Patrick McCormack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kaufmann v. Fields
as 7:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Chase Kaufmann
Defendant:
Deputy B. Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaufmann v. Fields
as 5:2023ct03045
Plaintiff:
Chase Kaufmann
Defendant:
Deputy B. Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields, II. v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv04105
Plaintiff:
Reginald B. Fields, II.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fields v. Bouria et al
as 3:2022cv01656
Plaintiff:
Marcus B. Fields
Defendant:
Pfizer C.E.O. Albert Bouria and John or Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Bouria et al
as 1:2022cv07971
Plaintiff:
Marcus B. Fields
Defendant:
Pfizer C.E.O. Albert Bouria and John or Jane Doe's
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Kansas Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-3123
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMARA B. FIELDS, individually and as personal representative for the estate of DARTON A. FIELDS, II
Defendant / Appellee:
KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Parole Division and JACOB SNYDER, individually and in his official capacity
Fields v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv01451
Plaintiff:
Victor B. Fields
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Alex Pedrin v. T. Middleton, et al
as 21-6135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEX JOSEPH PEDRIN
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER T. MIDDLETON, USP-McCreary, OFFICER DAULTON, USP-McCreary, WARDEN CHRISTOPHER GOMEZ, USP-McCreary and others
Fields v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv02239
Plaintiff:
Tamara B. Fields
Defendant:
Jacob Snyder and Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
