Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ernest Kirk, et al v. Calhoun County, MI, et al
as 19-2456
Defendant:
C.M. YOUNG, acting in their individual capacity, all jointly and severally, B. LINCOLN, acting in their individual capacity, all jointly and severally, MATTHEW SAXTON, Sheriff, acting individually and in his official capacity, all jointly and severally and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ERNEST KIRK and CLAUDIA KIRK
Defendant / Appellant:
DEPUTY SPARKS and BRANDY EDMONDS, Sergeant, acting in her individual capacity, all jointly and severally
Lincoln v. Lincoln et al
as 1:2019cv00933
Defendant:
Carly B. Lincoln, Robert Lopresti and Hon. Ellen R Greenberg
Plaintiff:
David G. Lincoln
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kirk et al v. Calhoun, County of et al
as 1:2017cv00589
Plaintiff:
Ernest Kirk and Claudia Kirk
Defendant:
Calhoun, County of , Matthew Saxton , Brandy Edmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirk v. Calhoun County et al
as 2:2016cv13766
Plaintiff:
Ernest Kirk and Dr. Claudia Kirk
Defendant:
Calhoun County, Sheriff Matthew Saxton, Sergeant Brandy Edmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
S & B Lincoln Apartments I, LLC v. SGN+A, Inc.
as 8:2015cv00170
Defendant:
SGN+A, Inc.
Plaintiff:
S & B Lincoln Apartments I, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pritchett v. Wallace et al
as 1:2013cv00100
Plaintiff:
Eric Pritchett
Defendant:
Ian Wallace, Unknown Wigfall, Clifton Cossey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dana Lincoln v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 13-12553
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANA B. LINCOLN
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Lincoln v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2010cv00090
Petitioner:
Dana B. Lincoln
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
