Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Meeks v. NC Administrative Office of the Courts
as 5:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Melanie B. Meeks
Defendant:
NC Administrative Office of the Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Meeks et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02450
Plaintiff:
David B. Meeks and Robyn M. Meeks
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Big Oak Farms, Inc. v. US
as 19-1748
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAURA B. MEEK FOR JANET BONDURANT Q-TIP TRUST, SAMMIE L. PONDER, LESLIE FOX FARMS, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
MARTY HUTCHISON, TERRY HEQUENBOURG, BURKE LAND CO. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Meeks v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 3:2018cv01431
Plaintiff:
Charles B Meeks
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and DePuy Orthopaedics Inc
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meeks v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as ALN/2:17-cv-02119
Plaintiff:
Charles B Meeks
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Depuy Orthopaedics Inc
Meeks v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 2:2017cv02119
Plaintiff:
Charles B Meeks
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc and Depuy Orthopaedics Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. California Correctional Center et al
as 2:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Oscar Clayborne Lee
Defendant:
California Correctional Center, S. Perry, Shavers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mabe v. Meeks et al
as 6:2015cv02573
Plaintiff:
Joey Brandon Mabe
Defendant:
B Meeks, F Berrios and T Graves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Meek
as 1:2014cv02079
Plaintiff:
Mark W. King
Defendant:
John B. Meek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meek et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv32957
Plaintiff:
Donna L. Meek and Wallace B. Meek
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
