Cases 1 - 10 of 3,379
Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc, et al
as 24-1774
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG, Esq.
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC, DOW INC, CORTEVA INC and others
ITR America, LLC v. Florida Track & Power, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01027
Plaintiff:
ITR America, LLC
Defendant:
Florida Track & Power, Inc. and John Doe, as the personal representative or Executor of the Estate of Wayne Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ackerman et al v. Arkema Inc.
as 4:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Ackerman, Mary Ackerman, Sylbestre Aburto and others
Defendant:
Arkema Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Baughman v. Bowman
as 24-40286
Plaintiff:
Steven Kurt Baughman
Defendant:
Jimmy Bowman, Warden, Powledge Unit, Vernon Mitchel, Assitant Warden, Powledge Unit, Ronnie Stanhope, Lieutenant, Powledge Unit and others
Timothy BallardIn re: Timothy Ballard
as 24-3340
Petitioner:
In re: TIMOTHY BALLARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Vestal v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
James Vestal
Defendant:
MD Karen Ballard Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 233 Civil Actions or Proceedings Against Commissioned Officers or Employees
Ballard v. County of Rockland et al
as 7:2024cv02944
Plaintiff:
Wayne Ballard
Defendant:
County of Rockland, Thomas E. Walsh, II, Peter Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6172
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
