Cases 121 - 130 of 3,603
Jaime Luevano v. United States Texas Judges, et al
as 21-1092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAIME LUEVANO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES TEXAS JUDGES, O.I.G., DONALD J. TRUMP and BARACK OBAMA, ET. AL.
William Kaetz v. The United States, et al
as 21-1018
Defendant / Appellee:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, THE UNITED STATES, All 50 States, BARACK OBAMA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM F. KAETZ
Saturn v. Austin Bergstrom International Airport et al
as 1:2020cv01176
Defendant:
Dell Medical Center at UT System, Washington Mutual Bank, City of Austin and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Saturn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HERRERA et al v. BIDEN et al
as 4:2020cv00555
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, BARACK OBAMA, PAM BONDI and others
Plaintiff:
GITTE TOLDSTED and MARIO HERRERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05868
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Desai v. Biden et al
as 1:2020cv01579
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Barack Obama, Robert Hunter Biden and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Desai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montag v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv00325
Defendant:
Carlos Solis, Scott Montag, Sara OConnor and others
Plaintiff:
Mathew Montag
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
John Oberuch, Jr. v. State of New Jersey, et al
as 20-2860
Defendant / Appellee:
TWIN OAKS COMMUNITY SERVICES, GEORGE FEEHAN, JR., EDDY COUNTY NM POLICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN OBERUCH, JR.
Edwin R. Moran v. Face Book et al
as 8:2020cv01376
Defendant:
A.I. Company, Bob Benken, Mark Zuckerberg and others
Plaintiff:
Edwin R. Moran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POHLE v. PENCE et al
as 4:2020cv00139
Defendant:
JOHN G ROBERTS, JOE BIDEN, JOHN BRENNAN and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. POHLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
