Cases 1 - 10 of 100
BARTELS v. SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS
as 2:2026cv01733
Plaintiff:
JEFF BARTELS
Defendant:
SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Bartels v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 5:2026cv00316
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Bartels and Stephanie McKinney
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Lexington Federal Medical Center - Atwood Satellite Camp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bingaman v. Null et al
as 2:2026cv01585
Plaintiff:
Patricia Bingaman
Defendant:
J. Glenn Null, Mammen & Null, Lawyers, LLC, Catalyst Law, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bingaman et al v. Lenox et al
as 2:2026cv01568
Plaintiff:
Patricia Bingaman and Levi Bakke
Defendant:
Aaron Lenox, Erin Smith, Tempie Bartell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Howard v. Bartels
as 3:2026cv00937
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Howard
Defendant:
Ashlyn Bartels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv05266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
DICKMAN v. BARTELL et al
as 1:2026cv02262
Plaintiff:
MARK JAMES DICKMAN
Defendant:
JEREMY BARTELL and BARTELL LAW PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Baker v. Luxury Time Global, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv01473
Plaintiff:
Omar Baker
Defendant:
Luxury Time Global, LLC and Eric Bartels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Reynolds (PS) v. Lt. Whisker et al
as 1:2026cv02296
Plaintiff:
Nikolai L Reynolds
Defendant:
Lt. Whisker, Michael Doughretty, Megan A. Ring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
