Cases 1 - 10 of 79
DeAndre Harris v. Matt Macauley
as 24-1060
Petitioner:
DEANDRE HARRIS
Respondent:
MATT MACAULEY, Warden, Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility
Robert Price v. MDOC, et al
as 24-1062
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH-LEWIS PRICE
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ST. LOUIS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN CHRISTIANSEN, Warden and others
Robert Pann v. Brian Hadden, et al
as 23-2014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT WILLIAM PANN
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN HADDEN, KAYLA JOHNSON, K. CHAUVEZ and others
Gibbons v. Phipps et al (TV2)
as 2:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gibbons
Defendant:
Dale Phipps, City of Kingsport, Tennessee, Daniel Horne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bellamy v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02540
Plaintiff:
Jerome Bellamy
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wood v. Hut American Group LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Ricky Wood
Defendant:
Hut American Group LLC, Flynn Restaurant Group LP, Jeremy Biser and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Price v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv11872
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Lewis Price
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, St. Louis Central Michigan Correctional Facility and Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility
Quarles v. Reynolds et al
as 0:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Roshaun D. Quarles
Defendant:
J. Reynolds, Melissa Pelfrey, Jacqueline Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv10219
Plaintiff:
Robert Price
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, St. Louis Central Corrections, John Christiansen and others
Pann #254048 v. Hadden et al
as 1:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Robert Pann #254048
Defendant:
B. Hadden, K. Johnson, K. Chauvez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
