Cases 1 - 10 of 100
English v. Weber et al
as 1:2026cv00136
Plaintiff:
James Walter English
Defendant:
Ryan Arbon, Weber County, Benard Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitaker v. Caudill et al
as 5:2026cv00296
Plaintiff:
Benard Whitaker
Defendant:
Warden Abigail Caudill, Wendy Bates, Shannon Wiles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitaker v. Caudill et al
as 3:2026cv00604
Plaintiff:
Benard Whitaker
Defendant:
Warden Abigail Caudill, Wendy Bates, Shannon Wiles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flagg v. Carothers et al
as 1:2026cv01333
Plaintiff:
Jerome Flagg
Defendant:
. Carothers, . Wendes, . Paige and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rogers et al v. Bommarito et al
as 1:2026cv12646
Plaintiff:
Deonte Benard Rogers and Robin Lynn Donaldson
Defendant:
Lori Bommarito, Leland Burton, Mike Mishic and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
SUMMERS v. WILSON, et al
as 1:2026cv01540
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SUMMERS and CHARLES BENARD SUMMERS
Defendant:
HARDYING, NICOLE WILSON, LAJOWER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Summers v. Wilson et al
as 3:2026cv01079
Plaintiff:
Charles Summers and Charles Benard Summers
Defendant:
Hardying, Nicole Wilson, Lajower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. White
as 6:2026cv06096
Plaintiff:
Tarrants Benard Carter, Sr and Chip
Defendant:
Walten White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. White
as 4:2026cv00712
Plaintiff:
Tarrants Benard Carter, Sr
Defendant:
Walten White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
