Cases 31 - 40 of 573
TIMMONS v. IRWIN, et al.
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
BRANDON TIMMONS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT R. IRWIN, SECRETARY LAUREN HARRY, DIRECTOR JAMES BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTINEZ v. BEST et al
as 2:2023cv02114
Plaintiff:
WILFREDO MARTINEZ
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER NICOLE BEST, CORRECTIONS OFFICER WILLS, HEARING EXAMINER I. YODIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv03080
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Defendant:
Jerlen Allen, Norris, Selmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Trainor v. Wellpath, et al
as 23-1771
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES M. TRAINOR
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLPATH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, CRNP SUTHERLAND and others
Best v. Greene
as 1:2023cv00918
Petitioner:
Brian Keith Best
Respondent:
David Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Leonard v. CSP-Sacramento
as 2:2023cv00601
Plaintiff:
Jason Thor Leonard
Defendant:
California State Prison - Sacramento and Best
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Potter v. Andrew Jones, et al
as 23-1586
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jason M. Potter
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew Jones, Officer, Lee's Summit Police Department, City of Lee's Summit, Brad Anders, Officer, Lee's Summit Police Department and others
(PC) Thompson v. Kuppinger et al
as 2:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
DeWayne Thompson
Defendant:
P. Kuppinger, Udhe, Banish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6214
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tatar v. Griffin et al
as 2:2023cv02023
Defendant:
CMC Johnson, STA Zebtaski, Edu Officer (F/N/U) Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
Serdar Tatar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
