Cases 1 - 10 of 13
ALLEN v. GOLDS GYM - BURLINGTON et al
as 1:2022cv00574
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
GOLDS GYM - BURLINGTON, GOLDS GYM - CHAPEL HILL, CHAPEL HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Brian Austin v. Warden Gail Watts
as 22-6660
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH AUSTIN
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN GAIL WATTS and STATES ATTORNEY BEVERLY SMITH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00742
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOOPER v. FRIESE et al
as 1:2019cv01031
Defendant:
PHILIP KEVIN BERGER, JEFF HUX, BEVERLY SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
IVAN HOOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrelson et al v. Wells Fargo, NA
as 3:2019cv02556
Defendant:
Wells Fargo, NA
Plaintiff:
Charles Ginn, Rick Graef, JoAnn Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LINDIMENT v. JONES
as 1:2017cv00501
Plaintiff:
ERICA LINDIMENT, P.S., L.L and others
Defendant:
BRIDGETTE JONES, BEVERLY SMITH, BRIDGETT JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LINDIMENT v. SMITH et al
as 1:2016cv01269
Plaintiff:
ERICA LINDIMENT
Defendant:
BEVERLY SMITH, BRIDGETTE JONES, ROCKINGHAM COUNTY CPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08307
Plaintiff:
Beverly Smith
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Tissue Science Laboratories Limited , Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv09619
Plaintiff:
Beverly Smith and Charles Smith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv03593
Plaintiff:
Beverly Smith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
