Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Ross v. Pike, et al
as 24-1249
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
PIKE, Administrator at Somerset County Jail, D. GRAY, JAQUES, Sargent at Somerset County Jail and others
Walsh v. PowerFleet, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Matthew Walsh
Defendant:
PowerFleet, Inc., Michael Brodsky, Steve Towe and others
Clark v. PowerFleet, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00781
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clark
Defendant:
PowerFleet, Inc., Michael Brodsky, Steve Towe and others
ROSS v. PIKE et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE ROSS
Defendant:
PIKE, D GRAY, JAQUES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Howard et al
as 9:2023cv00915
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Sgt. Howard, Sgt. Topel, Sgt. Brinkerloft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BJORK v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BJORK
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BJORK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20895
Plaintiff:
HAROLD BJORK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderson v. Memphis Union Mission et al
as 2:2022cv02402
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Anderson
Defendant:
Memphis Union Mission, D. Scott Bjork, Terry W. Brimhall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Bjork v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Chavah L Bjork
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Latwahn McElroy v. Gomez, et al
as 21-16410
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATWAHN MCELROY
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER GOMEZ, FACILITY SERGEANT BJORK, DOE, Clinic Physician; NKSP Physician and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
