Cases 1 - 10 of 1,296
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Justin Shaffer v. Daryl Bloom, et al
as 24-1828
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN ERIC SHAFFER
Defendant:
DARYL F. BLOOM, Assistant Supervisor Attorney Prosecutor, CARLO D. MARCHIOLI, Assistant USA Attorney, JOHN C. GURGANUS, JR., United States Attorney (Primary Defendant) and others
IPN, LLC v. Slang Inc.
as 9:2024cv80584
Plaintiff:
IPN, LLC doing business as Paybotic
Defendant:
SLANG INC. doing business as Bloom Brothers.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Bloom v. SSI Holdco, LLC
as 2:2024cv11207
Plaintiff:
Robert Bloom as Trustee of the Robert A. Bloom Trust u/a/d March 5, 2022
Defendant:
SSI Holdco, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BLOOM et al
as 2:2024cv01783
Defendant:
MEDICAL DEPOT, INC. also known as DRIVE MEDICAL doing business as DRIVE DEVILBISS HEALTHCARE and DRIVE MEDICAL
Plaintiff:
SUSAN BLOOM and ARAM BLOOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Bloom v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02983
Plaintiff:
Marilela Bloom
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bloom et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01347
Plaintiff:
Barry Bloom and Dorothy Bloom
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital
as 24-954
Plaintiff:
NELLA MANKO
Defendant:
LENOX HILL HOSPITAL, DANA A. MANNOR, M.D., NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM and others
IPN, LLC v. Bloom et al
as 9:2024cv80453
Plaintiff:
IPN, LLC
Defendant:
Michael Bloom and Safe Payments, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BLOOM et al v. NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01506
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BLOOM and HARRIET BLOOM
Defendant:
NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
