Cases 11 - 20 of 1,976
Dawn Keefer, et al v. President United States of America, et al
as 24-1716
Plaintiff:
DAWN KEEFER and TIMOTHY BONNER
Defendant:
PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA and SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARTIN v. MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, LLC, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, CRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BONNER v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05189
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
SHARLA BONNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lawrence v. Daseke, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Daseke, Inc., Chuck Serianni, Jonathan Shepko and others
Bonner v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50145
Petitioner:
Lee Bonner
Respondent:
Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bonner, LLC v. Royce Anderson
as 2:2024cv02842
Plaintiff:
Bonner, LLC
Defendant:
Royce Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
JONES v. BONNER et al
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
BONNER, REED, POPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00689
Petitioner:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02225
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Shelby County Commissioners, Kirk Field and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Synchron et al
as 1:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Willie Ernest Bonner, Jr.
Defendant:
Synchron, Neuralink and Jeff Bezos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
