Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Boykin v. Texas Dodge, LLLP
as 2:2026cv00164
Plaintiff:
Michael Boykin
Defendant:
Texas Dodge, LLLP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Boykin v. Dille
as 2:2026cv12586
Plaintiff:
Aaron Boykin
Defendant:
Luke Dille
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Boggs v. Mail et al
as 5:2026ct03221
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Boggs
Defendant:
Donald Mail, Willie Rowe, Officer J. Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boykin v. English et al
as 3:2026cv01075
Plaintiff:
Thristian Boykin and Thristian Michael Boykin
Defendant:
Brian English, Aaron Smith, Kelcie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLE v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2026cv00162
Plaintiff:
TYRIEK S. COLE
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, WILLIAM ARBAUGH, JESSE MONTANK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boykins v. United States of America
as 5:2026cv01811
Petitioner:
Antonio Lamurael Boykins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Derrick Allen v. Terrence Boyle, et al
as 26-5261
Plaintiff:
Derrick Allen, Sole Proprietor, Allen & Allen Supplies
Defendant:
Terrence W. Boyle, U.S. District Judge, Eastern District of North Carolina, Willie Rowe, Sheriff, Paul C. Ridgeway, Resident Superior Court Judge and others
BOYKIN v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv04589
Plaintiff:
FELECIA FAYE BOYKIN
Defendant:
PFIZER INC and PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
