Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Fitts et al v. Newberry et al
as 4:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Colby Blake Fitts and Kayla Nicole Fitts
Defendant:
Don Newberry, Amy Strahan, Tiffany McDaniels Acting Head Teller doing business as Madison County Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hughes v. USA
as 4:2019cv00441
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Bradley Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tocker 085358 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv00350
Petitioner:
Bradley Hugh Tocker
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hughes v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
as 7:2016cv00357
Plaintiff:
Bradley Hughes
Defendant:
Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47*
OFI Asset Management, et al v. Cooper Tire & Rubber, et al
as 15-2664
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OFI ASSET MANAGEMENT and TIMBER HILL LLC, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
COOPER TIRE & RUBBER, ROY ARMES and BRADLEY HUGHES
Hughes v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv05121
Plaintiff:
Bradley Hughes
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Bui v. Armes et al
as 1:2014cv01272
Plaintiff:
David Bui and Henry Zwang
Defendant:
Roy V. Armes , Bradley Hughes , Thomas P. Capo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Artt et al v. Orange Lake Country Club, Inc.
as 6:2014cv00956
Plaintiff:
Debra Artt , Bradley Hughes , Adam Israel and others
Defendant:
Orange Lake Country Club, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Fitzgerald v. Armes et al
as 1:2014cv00479
Plaintiff:
Jim Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Roy Armes, Bradley Hughes, R. W. Huber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Booth Family Trust v. Armes et al
as 3:2014cv00724
Plaintiff:
Booth Family Trust
Defendant:
Roy V. Armes, Bradley Hughes, Thomas P. Capo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
