Cases 1 - 10 of 629
Stilwell v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65823
Defendant:
Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior Inc. and Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. f/k/a MonoSol RX, LLC
Plaintiff:
Brant Stilwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plyler v. Oxy USA Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv04681
Plaintiff:
Brant Plyler
Defendant:
Oxy USA Inc. and Enrique Rodriguez Romero
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv09432
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Johnson v. Satterfield et al
as 1:2024cv00194
Defendant:
Brant Bristow, Josh Roberts, Todd Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Benny Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newcomer v. Greene et al
as 3:2024cv03286
Defendant:
. Garbett, . Little, . Dickson and others
Plaintiff:
Bostyn Newcomer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Park Meadows HC2, LLC
as 4:2024cv00670
Defendant:
PARK MEADOWS HC2, LLC, JH Park Meadows KC LLC and Pamela Brant
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Carlyle Development, LLC v. Camden, City of et al
as 3:2024cv05697
Defendant:
Kershaw County, Johnny Deal, City of Camden Planning Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Carlyle Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wiltz et al v. Yost et al
as 2:2024cv04000
Defendant:
Ohio Health Physician Group, Officer Brenda Wadsworth, Judge David Gormley and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Dan Burnett and Cassandra R Wiltz
Counter-Claimant:
Ohio Health Corporation
Counter-Defendant:
Cassandra R Wiltz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Griffin et al v. Olson
as 1:2024cv00914
Defendant:
Erlend Olson
Plaintiff:
Brant Griffin and Randi Mondello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
