Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Cerny et al v. 3001 Caster, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv05035
Plaintiff:
Amanda Cerny, ARIANNY CELESTE LOPEZ, IESHA MARIE CRESPO and others
Petitioner:
Arabella Drummond
Defendant:
3001 Caster, LLC, LIEUTANT ANTHONY BOYLE and Brian David Clark
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Matthew Houston v. L.B.B.S., et al
as 23-15810
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
L.B.B.S., Termed by ECF No. 5, DANIEL SCHWARTZ, CALVIN JOHNSON and others
Clarke et al v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv02158
Plaintiff:
Brian A. Clarke, Delano Dorsaint, David Pouncy III and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clark v. Tanner et al
as 1:2022cv01264
Plaintiff:
Brian Andrew Clark
Defendant:
Nicholas Tanner, Kenneth Ryserdoph, Huntington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. L.B.B.S. et al
as 2:2022cv01780
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
L.B.B.S., Daniel Schwartz, Calvin Johnson and others
CLARK v. USA
as 1:2022cv01456
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ANDREW CLARK
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Houston v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2022cv01607
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Joe Lombardo, Carolyn Goodman, Miranda M. Du and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(SS) Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01139
Plaintiff:
Brian Rector Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Richardson v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Antwan L. Richardson
Defendant:
Brian S. Clark, William W. Young, Doug Macut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPARKS v. BAILY et al
as 1:2021cv01579
Defendant:
BRIAN A. CLARK, DECATUR COUNTY, ROSS G. THOMAS and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL HERBERT SPARKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
