Cases 1 - 10 of 1,031
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1468
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Rolon v. City of New York
as 24-1439
Plaintiff:
KAYLA ROLON, COREY GILZEAN, MICHAEL HERNANDEZ and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT, Mayor BILL DE BLASIO and others
Intervenor:
POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, INC.
Brik v. Brodie
as 24-1347
Plaintiff:
ROMAN BRIK
Defendant:
MARGO K. BRODIE, CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE, in individual and official capacity and ANN M. DONNELLY, DISTRICT JUDGE, in individual and official capacity
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1420
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Clark v. Howe et al
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Brodie Lee Doyle Clark
Defendant:
Kyle Howe, City of Toledo, Iowa, Brandon Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Craven et al v. Highlander Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Brody Alan Craven and Michelle Craven
Defendant:
Highlander Specialty Insurance Company, Rayyon Cargo, Inc., Eric Niyomugabo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle
Brodie v. USA
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Andre M. Brodie
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Vore v. Michel et al
as 2:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
Adam Vore
Defendant:
Det. Timothy S. Michel, Det. James Brodie and Barbara Vore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tucker, et al v. Werfel
as 24-1147
Petitioner:
CASSANDRA TUCKER and EDWARD F. BRODIE
Respondent:
DANIEL I. WERFEL, Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service
Brodie v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Douglas Brodie
Defendant:
Ross Dress for Less, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
