Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.11 Acres of Land, Owned by Carlton Vaden Morton and Betty Brown Morton, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
0.11 Acres of Land, Owned by Carlton Vaden Morton and Betty Brown Morton, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
BROWN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
Elyse Brown and ELYSE I. BROWN
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wartley Jr. v. Bashert et al
as 2:2021cv12609
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Wartley Jr. and Lawrence Larry Wartley
Defendant:
Beth Bashert, Lois Richardson, Nicole Brown and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA upon the relation and for the use of the TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, v. An Easement and Right-of-Way over 0.46 Acre of Land, More or Less and Additional Rights with Respect to an Existing Easement and Right-of-Way over Land i
as 1:2021cv00239
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA upon the relation and for the use of the TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY,
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way over 0.46 Acre of Land, More or Less and Additional Rights with Respect to an Existing Easement and Right-of-Way over Land in Meigs County, Tennessee, Ruben L McKenzie, III and Vennia Michele Brown McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 a
Ugorets et al v. City of Shorewood et al
as 0:2021cv01446
Plaintiff:
Alex Ugorets and Elena Ugorets
Defendant:
Nathaniel Gorhan, City of Shorewood, Greg Lerud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America et al v. 0.005 Acre of Land, More or Less, & Cemetery, Bural & Access Rights with Respect to Six Tracks of Land et al
as 3:2021cv00249
Defendant:
Lena Ruth Redd Davis, Unknown Heirs of Martha Polite, Jaqueline D. Woodard and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Tennessee Valley Authority Act
Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC v. 0.401 Acres of Land in Putnam County, Florida et al
as 3:2021cv00230
Defendant:
Alzeta Duggan, Janet Hampton, Rose Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0717
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Easements to Construct, Operate, and Maintain a Natural Gas Pipeline Over Tracts of Land in Pittsylvania County, Virginia, Including: et al
as 4:2021cv00002
Defendant:
1.71 Acres of Land, Owned by David Lee Adams and Teressa H. Adams, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 2.60 Acres of Land, Owned by Faye L. Lowe and Glenn Anthony Lowe, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 5.36 Acres of Land, Owned by Dana H. Sparks, Trustee of the Billie Anne Harmon Living Trust, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC v. EASEMENTS TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, AND MAINTAIN A NATURAL GAS PIPELINE OVER TRACTS OF LAND IN ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, GUILFORD AND ALAMANCE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA INCLUDING:
as 1:2021cv00047
Defendant:
1.93 Acres of Land Owned by John Ray Cole and Ravonda Lynn Cole, 9.74 Acres of Land Owned by Jackie Burris Johnson And Ted Mack Johnson And Easement Claimed By Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 0.06 Acres of Land Owned by Susano B. Jaimes and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Oklahoma City City of v. 100 Foot Wide Continuous Extended Term Easement and Other Related Pump Station Continuous Extended Term Easements and rights-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2020cv00023
Defendant:
Delores Ann Springer, John Charles Tiger, Nancie Lou Longacres Warrior and others
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma City City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
