Cases 41 - 50 of 4,075
Brown v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv06037
Plaintiff:
Katrina L Brown
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Simmons v. Brown et al
as 0:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
Asanti Jahi Simmons
Defendant:
Alexander Vladimir Brown and City of Minneapolis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Brown v. USA
as 4:2024cv00360
Petitioner:
Xavier Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Flennoy v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Flennoy
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Woolfolk, Britney Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Deputy Divison Director et al
as 4:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Juan Vasquez Brown
Defendant:
Deputy Division Director, Grievance Officer, Property Room Staff Sergent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. EssilorLuxottica S.A. et al
as 0:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
Peter Brown
Defendant:
EssilorLuxottica S.A., Luxottica Group, S.p.A., Essilor International SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Maget v. Richard et al
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Abbagayle Marie Maget and Kevin Lee Maget
Defendant:
Richard, Brush-Strode, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Browning v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00736
Plaintiff:
Timothy Browning, Sr.
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
