Cases 1 - 10 of 19
KEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU PRISONS et al
as 2:2022cv00518
Petitioner:
DAJUAN KEY
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU PRISONS and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kirkland v. Federal Bureau Prison
as 1:2022cv04576
Petitioner:
Martel Kirkland, Jr.
Respondent:
Federal Bureau Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mescall v. Federal Bureau Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv00871
Plaintiff:
Sean F. Mescall
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Prisons and Warden F. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. FEDERAL BUREAU PRISONS et al
as 4:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
ELLIOTT TOMETRIU WALKER
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU PRISONS, DON, DR BRIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fruit v. McElfresh et al
as 4:2019cv00033
Defendant:
Lt McElfresh, Amy Brady, Unnamed Director of Federal Bureau Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
David Fruit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRISON v. FEDERAL BUREAU PRISON
as 2:2017cv02731
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN HARRISON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Keyes v. Nassau County Court et al
as 2:2016cv05995
Defendant:
Chief Administrative Judge, Chief Executive Clerk, Clerk of United States District Court EDNY and others
Plaintiff:
Keysean L. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flynn v. U.S. Federal Bureau Prisons
as 2:2015cv10989
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Flynn
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Bureau Prisons
MANGUM v. USA et al
as 1:2014cv00343
Petitioner:
ANTHONY WAYNE MANGUM
Respondent:
USA , BUREAU PRISONS and WARDEN S. HALLEMBAEK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Juan Diaz, Jr. v. Attorney General United States, et al
as 13-1869
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN DIAZ, JR.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHARLES SAMUEL, Director for F.B.O.P., HARRELL WATTS, General Counsel for F.B.O.P., J. L. NORWOOD, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
