Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Baird v. HCA Healthcare, Inc.
as 3:2026cv01774
Defendant:
HCA Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Andrew Baird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Edwards v. Buda et al
as 4:2026cv12612
Plaintiff:
Anthony Edwards
Defendant:
Daniel Buda, Doctor Michael Yeh, Doctor Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelayo et al v. NBE Green Bay LLC et al
as 1:2026cv01997
Defendant:
NBE Green Bay LLC doing business as North Baird MHC, North Baird MHC, Denise Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Cesar M Pelayo and Amparo Alvarado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baird v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2026cv04584
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics, Stryker Orthopaedics, Stryker Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
James Michael Baird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
William Plummer v. Lisa Baird, et al
as 26-3638
Plaintiff:
William Plummer
Defendant:
Lisa Baird, Doctor and Rossman, Nurse
Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund v. York Space Systems Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv05344
Plaintiff:
Teamsters Local 710 Pension Fund
Defendant:
York Space Systems Inc., Dirk Wallinger, Kevin Messerle and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP v. Byrd et al
as 1:2026cv27307
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP
Defendant:
Cord Byrd, KIM BARTON, Chris Milton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilmore-Bey v. Steiner et al
as 2:2026cv13825
Plaintiff:
Nintu Xi Gilmore-Bey
Defendant:
David Paul Steiner, Gretchen Whitmer, Dana Nessel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sivak v. Hernandez, et al.
as 26-6536
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
HERNANDEZ, NAGU, NICK BAIRD, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
