Cases 1 - 10 of 181
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv02938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Gonzalez v. Lexington Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv10908
Plaintiff:
Tania Gonzalez
Defendant:
Lexington Police Department, Christopher Barry, Michael Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Davis v. Beacon Lodge House et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Mitchel Davis
Defendant:
Beacon Lodge House, Darren Hodgdon and April McCreery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Waldron v. Independent Living Association, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Waldron
Defendant:
Independent Living Association, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Beacon Therapy Services, PLLC, Access Staffing, LLC and PearlCare Search Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Royall v. City of Beacon et al
as 7:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Donovan Royall
Defendant:
City of Beacon, Civil Service Employees Association, Emilio Giordano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
