Cases 11 - 20 of 2,006
Eads v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Eads
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
MCKENZIE v. COWELL et al
as 2:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
DEAN MCKENZIE
Defendant:
DR. KAYON AYTON COWELL, BEATRICE PYE and MICHAEL M. MCKENZIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawley v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00605
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Hawley
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Dalewitz v. JusLaw LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Michael Dalewitz
Defendant:
JusLaw LLC, JusGlobal, LLC and Beatrice O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
United States of America v. Millet (Roman)
as 24-18
Defendant:
RICHARD MORALES, HECTOR LUIS RIOS, MARIA VIDRO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MANUEL E. ROMAN, Manny and Pito
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Valdez et al v. Volz et al
as 4:2023cv01205
Plaintiff:
Daniel Valdez, Beatrice Valdez, Valerie Valdez and others
Defendant:
Richard James Volz and Heavensent Freight LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Guinac-Velasquez v. Garland
as 23-4259
Petitioner:
ERICELDA BEATRICE GUINAC-VELASQUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Brown v. Michaels Stores, Inc.
as 1:2023cv05746
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Brown
Defendant:
Michaels Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
