Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Baehr v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11193
Plaintiff:
Benjamin James Baehr
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez et al v. Noble et al
as 4:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Jesus Rodriguez and Rosa Rodriguez
Defendant:
Benjamin James Noble and Redhead Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Rettig v. Bendarski et al
as 2:2024cv10298
Plaintiff:
Benjamin James Rettig
Defendant:
Bendarski, Thiem, Burciaga and others
Rettig v. Bendarski et al
as 2:2024cv10299
Plaintiff:
Benjamin James Rettig
Defendant:
Bendarski, Thiem, Burciago and others
BOSSCHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12198
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN JAMES BOSSCHER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Handy v. Hollenbach et al
as 4:2023cv04150
Plaintiff:
Benjamin James Handy
Defendant:
. Hollenbach, Margaret Madole and Latoya Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARIDGE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15964
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN JAMES CLARIDGE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07976
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN JAMES BELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Randy Dingle v. Talmage Baggett
as 23-1325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
TALMAGE S. BAGGETT, Judge, ELLEN B. HANCOX, Trial Clerk Administrator, RONNIE MONROE MITCHELL, Attorney and others
Michael Grabowski v. Arizona Board of Regents, et al
as 22-15714
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL GRABOWSKI, a single man
Defendant / Appellee:
ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA, FREDERICK LEE HARVEY, Director of Cross-Country/Track and Field and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
