Cases 1 - 10 of 375
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Jones v. Bennet et al
as 3:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Jones
Defendant:
Clay Bennet and Shondra Kirkland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Bennet et al
as 1:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Roderick Johnson
Defendant:
Officer Bennet and Officer Wolff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan v. Jagdfeld et al
as 1:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Joe Chan
Defendant:
Aaron Jagdfeld, Marcia J. Avedon, John D. Bowlin and others
Talidis v. IDOC et al
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
James B Talidis
Defendant:
IDOC, Rob Jeffreys, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odegaard v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00039
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Bennet Odegaard
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dority v. Bennet
as 1:2023cv01461
Petitioner:
Angela Michelle Dority
Respondent:
K. Bennet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sivak v. Bennet et al
as 3:2023cv06248
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
Mark J. Bennet and William A. Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dfinity Foundation v. New York Times Company
as 23-7838
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DFINITY FOUNDATION, Switzerland-based not-for-profit organization
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, a New York corporation, ANDREW ROSS SORKIN, an individual, EPHRAT LIVNI, an individual and others
Defendant:
CHARLIE SMITH, an individual
Doe v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv05745
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Charles Williams, Susan Duffy, Curtis Early and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
