Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ronald Ragan, Jr. v. Berkshire Hathaway Auto, Inc.
as 24-1616
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ragan, Jr.
Defendant:
Berkshire Hathaway Automotive, Inc.
Ronald Ragan, Jr. v. Berkshire Hathaway Auto, Inc.
as 22-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Ragan, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Berkshire Hathaway Automotive, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ragan v. Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00339
Defendant:
VOP Motors LLC, Crest Cadillac II LLC, Vandergriff Automotive II LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jr. Ragan and Ronald Ragan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goodell et al v. Berkshire Hathaway Automotive Incorporated
as 2:2020cv01657
Plaintiff:
Kerri Wolski and Brian Goodell
Defendant:
Berkshire Hathaway Automotive Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Fambrough v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00536
Defendant:
ESIS/General Motors LLC, Berkshire Hathaway Automotive (Van AutoPlex) and General Motors, LLC
Plaintiff:
William Fambrough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ragan v. Berkshire Hathaway Automotive, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv01010
Defendant:
Berkshire Hathaway Automotive, Inc. and Van Tuyl Companies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ronald V Ragan, Jr. and Ronald Ragan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Dishon v. Berkshire Hathaway Automotive
as 3:2018cv00241
Plaintiff:
Brett Dishon
Defendant:
Caroline Dishon-Goettl, Berkshire Hathaway Automotive and Zackery Taylor LeGate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
