Cases 61 - 70 of 146
Barrow v. William et al
as 3:2020cv00007
Defendant:
Ellen Hess, SFC Felix Rucker, Bertha H. Judge and others
Plaintiff:
David James Barrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emrit v. United States Department of Education et al
as 1:2020cv00035
Defendant:
Action Financial Services, Inc., NelNet, Default Resolution Group and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huawei Technologies USA, Inc. et al v. United States of America, et al
as 4:2019cv00159
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue, Robert Wilkie, Emily Webster Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Huawei Technologies USA, Inc. and Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Pernell Swahili El v. Elizabeth Dee Betsy DeVos et al
as 2:2020cv00205
Defendant:
James H. Steeley, US Department of Education, Elizabeth Dee Betsy DeVos and others
Plaintiff:
Pernell Swahili El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of Wisconsin, Department v. EDUC, et al
as 20-1016
Defendant / Appellee:
BETSY DEVOS and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Defendant / Appellant:
THERESA TAYLOR
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF WISCONSIN, DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT - DIVISION OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITAITON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00049
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00183
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00216
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00061
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00266
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
