Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Tenley Good v. BioLife Plasma Services, L.P., et al
as 24-1358
Plaintiff:
TENLEY MCLAUGHLIN GOOD
Defendant:
BIOLIFE PLASMA SERVICES, L.P. and SHIRE US, INC., aka Shire Pharmaceuticals
LARRISON v. BIOLIFE PLASMA SERVICES, L.P. et al
as 1:2023cv01848
Plaintiff:
Shawna Larrison
Defendant:
BIOLIFE PLASMA SERVICES, L.P. and BIOLIFE PLASMA L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hooper v. Hogue et al
as 5:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Demetric Lemond Hooper
Defendant:
Tiana Lorissa Robinson-Hogue, Oklahoma City Police Department, BioLife Plasma Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023at00483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
JONES v. BIOLIFE PLASMA SERVICES, L.P.
as 1:2023cv00775
Plaintiff:
Tessa Jones
Defendant:
BIOLIFE PLASMA SERVICES, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sweezer et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Jordan Sweezer and Marie Sweezer
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc., BioLife Plasma Services, L.P., BioLife Plasma LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
