Cases 1 - 10 of 1,303
Boswell v. The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00692
Defendant:
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Annie Jewell Boswell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Zurich American Insurance Company et al v. Basin Masonry, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and Zurich American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Zitting Construction and Development Inc., Boswell Wasatch Mill, LLC, Whistle Construction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
BECK v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00536
Defendant:
JEREMY ODOM, TIMOTHY SHELTON, BRANDON GIBBS and others
Plaintiff:
SEAN BECK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Werling v. United States Secret Service et al
as 2:2024cv01291
Defendant:
Dodge County WI, Agent Boswell, Jermaine Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Scott Werling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Boswell Medical Services et al
as 3:2024cv00590
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Warden Keith Brown, Burl Cain, Mississippi Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Kortez Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Hayes et al
as 6:2024cv00353
Defendant:
Officer Debinder, Petra Chumley, Sgt. Boswell and others
Plaintiff:
Malachi Joshua Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skenandore v. Boswell
as 2:2024cv01174
Plaintiff:
Charles D Skenandore
Defendant:
Dr Charles Boswell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boswell v. Warden
as 5:2024cv01088
Plaintiff:
Donald M Boswell
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ritesman v. Mooney et al
as 6:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Cody Ritesman
Defendant:
Mooney, Kirby, Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
