Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Washington v. Kahn et al
as 3:2017cv01956
Plaintiff:
Jayvell-Jones Washington
Defendant:
Maria Araujo Kahn, Robert Quintanilla, Jr., Ivan Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Boulay et al
as 3:2017cv00813
Plaintiff:
Haile Wilson
Defendant:
James Boulay, Luis Pomales, Douglas Stolze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fyffe v. Bridgeport et al
as 3:2017cv00804
Plaintiff:
Julian Fyffe
Defendant:
City of Bridgeport, Armando Perez, James Boulay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fyffe v. City of Bridgeport et al
as 5:2017cv00804
Plaintiff:
Julian Fyffe
Defendant:
City of Bridgeport, Armando Perez, James Boulay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fyffe v. City of Bridgeport et al
as 5:2017cv00803
Plaintiff:
Julian Fyffe
Defendant:
City of Bridgeport, Armando Perez, James Boulay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Farxiga (Dapagliflozin) Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2017md02776
Defendant:
Farxiga (Dapagliflozin) Products Liability Litigation, Astrazeneca AB, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Denzil Martin, Racheal Blois, June Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi
Boulay v. USA
as 6:2016cv00151
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Melissa Boulay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BOULAY v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01647
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN JOHN BOULAY
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC , EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC and PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Samuels v. Gelfman et al
as 1:2016cv00722
Plaintiff:
Victor E. Samuels
Defendant:
Lenore Gelfman, Mary M Kramer, Corrie A. Boulay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boulay v. Rivera et al
as 3:2015cv01251
Plaintiff:
Robert James Boulay
Defendant:
Rivera, Salius, Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
